Unplanned in Canada, death threats

After receiving death threats, two movie theaters in Canada have cancelled showing the anti-abortion movie ‘Unplanned’. ‘Unplanned’ is the story of anti-abortion activist Abby Johnson. For eight years she was the director of a Planned Parenthood clinic but switched to a Pro-life position after seeing a doctor perform an abortion. The Abortion Rights Coalition in Canada called the movie a “dangerous piece of anti-abortion propaganda.” Last time I checked, adult consumers had a right to make value judgements themselves, whether the secular authorities, the religious authorities, or various NGOs liked it or not. Death threats are unacceptable, and so is censorship. Conservative groups don’t have a right to ban movies that Liberals like, and Liberal groups don’t have a right to ban movies that Conservatives like.

Dem Primary, Sick People

by Serban V.C. Enache

On the subject of Health Care… None of these despicable democrats say that Insurance Companies DON’T produce a product or a service that treats illnesses or injuries. Insurance Companies DO NOT create wealth, they are wealth EXTRACTIVE.

These grotesque democrats are stressing how important health care is, but they don’t talk about mental health, they don’t talk about cancer, they don’t talk about viruses, they don’t talk about prosthetics – but the one thing they do talk about and talk about religiously is the “reproductive right and freedom” of women to kill fetuses irrespective of context. It’s not just about pregnancies as a result of rape, or if the pregnancy threatens the mother’s life, or if the fetus has life-threatening mutations [cases that Medicare For All should indeed cover], if you’ve been a dumb, careless, slut, the State is going to pay for the consequences of your hedonistic lifestyle, including late term abortion. What these sick liberals and sick progressives want is for the State to subsidize the consequences of hedonism, which is infanticide, in effect sponsoring the growth of the aforementioned phenomenons; and their wet dream is for the State to subsidize it at 100 percent.

The liberals and the progressives and the hypocritical pro-lifers before you’re born & anti-lifers once you’re out of the womb are demented to the extreme, and sadly, there is no cure in sight…

Politely debating Abortion? Dream on…

by Serban V.C. Enache

These pro-choicers [in the vid] can’t have a polite and calm discussion on the matter, not even with their fellow women. On the contrary, verbal aggression is the default mode. And they’re youngsters too… that speaks volumes of how bad the future will be in terms of [lack of reasonable] dialog. The more extreme one side gets, the more it pushes the other in the same extreme direction. The most ‘vigorous’ among the liberals want the State to fully subsidize abortions irrespective of circumstance [Forbes estimated in 2015 that the State and Federal Governments together subsidize about a quarter of all abortion costs in the US], de facto making this practice a preferred method of birth control. And they also want late term abortion to be legal and in case the abortion is botched [i.e. the baby gets birthed and is alive], they want the infant’s life terminated. I’m not very knowledgeable on biology, but up to the third moth of pregnancy, the fetus is no more developed than an ant? Surely abortion should be legal up to that point [at least] and if the pregnancy endangers the mother’s life.

In my opinion, pro-lifers would win much of the debate if they [at least] tolerated contraception and actually put the money [economic policy] where their mouth is. If they truly believe a fetus is a human being, then they should want the State looking out for that human being after it comes out of the womb as well. If only they supported Government investment in education, in health care [medicare for all], in employment schemes [particularly for the disadvantaged, the long term unemployed, and former convicts], in the social and physical infrastructure of communities, instead of preaching the Bible version of social-darwinism “For whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them.” (Matthew 25: 29). So long as they cling to this primitive and inequitable philosophy, they’ll remain hypocrites, pseudo-Christians, and will never have the moral high ground.

“Now listen, you rich people, weep and wail because of the misery that is coming on you. Your wealth has rotted, and moths have eaten your clothes. Your gold and silver are corroded. Their corrosion will testify against you and eat your flesh like fire. You have hoarded wealth in the last days. For listen! Hear the cries of the field workers whom you have cheated of their pay. The cries of those who harvest your fields have reached the ears of the Lord Almighty. You have lived on earth in luxury and self-indulgence. You have fattened yourselves for the day of slaughter.” (James 5:1-5:5)